Last year, New York City police officers were told that if they see any topless woman in public, they were not to arrest them. If crowds form, just disperse them in an orderly fashion.
To test how police would react to that directive, photographer Allen Henson began taking photos of topless women around the city. This past August, Henson and a model climbed to the crowded observation deck of the Empire State building, where the model proceeded to remove her top while Henson captured the event on his cell phone. Now, Henson faces a $1.1 million lawsuit from the Empire State Building (ESB).
Allen Henson faces a $1.1 million lawsuit from the Empire State Building for his topless photo shoot.
The suit claims that since Henson’s shoot was for a commercial purpose and he didn’t get prior permission form the ESB, he was effectively trespassing on ESB property. The ESB claims that Henson “intentionally violated rules of the Observatory, intentionally engaged in unauthorized, objectionable, and inappropriate conduct in full view of ESB’s customers, tenants, visitors, including families with children, and employees” and damaged its “reputation as a safe and secure family friendly tourist attraction.” The ESB also claims that the building had to “divert management time, resources and attention to deal with the inappropriate objectionable conduct and potentially dangerous situation the defendant created.” The ESB’s claims that Henson’s actions costs them $100,000 in damages with the remaining $1,000,000 being punitive.
Henson is shocked saying that it wasn’t a commercial shoot, “I am a professional photographer, but that doesn’t mean that every time I touch a device with a camera on it, I must be conducting a photo shoot.” He says he wasn’t trespassing. He paid admission and shot the topless woman on a cell phone. Since the shoot wasn’t for a commercial purpose, he didn’t need to get permission.
The ESB may have a point though. According to their website, permission is needed for a photo shoot.
We will consider requests that:
- Showcase ESB positively, respectfully and responsibly
- Feature ESB, and not just views/skyline shots from its Observatory
To request permission for filming or a photo session, please submit the following information . . . . Based on the volume of requests, responses may take up to two weeks. Keep in mind that requests are subject to licensing and location fees and agreements.
What is considered a “photo shoot” or was the shoot for a “commercial purpose” are among the various questions that will need to be answered as this case moves forwards. But the real question will be whether the ESB can show that they accrued damages of $100,000 and whether Henson’s should be required to pay $1,000,000 in punishment for his actions.
If you have any questions or any stories of your own, please leave your comments below or feel free to email me. And if you found this article interesting, please share it on your social media.
- Empire State Building sues snapper over topless photos (abc.net.au)
- Empire State Building sues photographer over topless shoot (foxnews.com)
- Empire State Building sues fashion photographer over topless photos (fashion.telegraph.co.uk)
157 Comments|Getty Images is one of the largest purveyor of stock photos in the world and aggressively protects their copyrights. With the Internet being an ocean of visual imagery ripe for the picking, many stolen images are from one of the Getty Stock Photography sites. It's so easy to copy photos from...
136 Comments|Should anyone find themselves a recipient of a Getty Demand letter, this article includes a sample response letter that might be helpful.
82 Comments|Today's artists and creative entrepreneurs use blogging as a necessary tool to demonstrate thought leadership and capture a dedicated audience and internet following. For artists and photographers, finding photos aren't usually a problem – they're just using their own. But what about lifestyle, fashion, and food bloggers, who tend to...
77 Comments|When the Copyright Act was first enacted in the United States, the copyright duration was only 14 years. Today Copyright duration can last over a century in some cases. Why such a drastic change? Some say it is all due to a cute little mouse named Mickey. Copyright duration had...
70 Comments|Buying visual art, such as an oil painting, and we may have joint ownership along with its creator. So what did we really buy?
- Can You Copyright an Idea?Understanding the difference between idea and expression is crucial to ensuring your creative work has sufficient copyright protection. […]
- Using Orphan Works (Copyright Holder Can’t Be Located)If the owner of a copyrighted work cannot be found, can I use it? It may be possible if you analyze the orphan work properly. […]
- The College Art Association Guide to Fair UseFair use is a common art law issue that arises for artists. Here, we review the College Art Association's Code of Best Practices in Fair Use for the Visual Arts. […]
- Is Facebook Censorship Legal?Facebook censorship policy is becoming more prevalent as it attempts to clean up fake news posted to the platform. But how does that affect Facebook users' right to Free Speech? […]
- Who Own Archaeological Treasures and ArtifactsThe treaties and laws around archaeological treasures and cultural heritage sites makes it difficult to know who owns the artifacts from the discoveries. […]